The new H&M and Billie Eilish collection just dropped on January 2, 2020, with H&M hailing it as “edgy and sustainable merch.” Call the collaboration whatever you wish, don’t call it sustainable.
|This article is a guest post and originally appeared on Eco-Stylist|
What the collection loudly puts forth in eco claims, it lacks in transparency and substance.
No, we’re not saying that Billie Eilish is a mal intended person, but calling this collection sustainable without giving customers clear indicators of why, which is typical of H&M, is greenwashing.
H&M is hardly alone in their assertion.
The Independent, New York Post, Fox Business, and WWD all name-dropped “sustainable” when describing the collaboration.
The problem: none of these publications investigated the sustainability claim for themselves, or even worse, they were aware of the issue and didn’t address it.
The New York Post states, “items in the line are designed from materials sourced more sustainably” with no explanation of what “more sustainable” really means.
Buzzwords such as “sustainable” may sound trustworthy and comfortable, but they’re also vague.
If “sustainable” is not further articulated, it doesn’t hold any weight.
“It’s all made from sustainable materials,” states Teen Vogue, a “fact” which should have been checked before they published it.
In actuality, only two of 16 items in the collection are part of H&M’s Conscious collection (which, by the way, isn’t even that impressive).
In comparison, the other 14 items are made just any fast-fashion piece: with planned obsolescence and by non-transparent means.
A Closer Look at H&M and Billie Eilish Collection
The H&M and Billie Eilish 16-piece collection consists of two “conscious” pieces: a pair of joggers and a t-shirt.
Regarding these two pieces, H&M notes that the cotton content is, in fact, organic, period.
That is the only information you’ll find on the product pages about how they are sustainable, and this is disappointing.
One would think putting a buzzword such as “sustainable” in the spotlight would mean no loose ends to get tied up in.
Even if we give H&M the benefit of the doubt and assume the two Conscious pieces are sustainably made, does having 12.5 per cent sustainable of your entire collection gives you the right to call it a “sustainable merch drop”?
Even a simple majority is at least over 50 per cent.
When Eco-Stylist is researching and evaluating sustainable brands, the threshold for calling a brand sustainable is for at least 50 per cent (a simple majority) of their collections to be sustainably made.
Most of our approved brands even go the extra mile, making 100% of their pieces with eco-friendly fabrics.
We’re transparent about all of this information, too.
This is because we give our consumers credit, and they can hold us accountable for our words.
So, H&M, if you’re going to boast about your sustainability, why not put your money where your mouth is?
WTVOX – ‘Voicing the Future of Fashion’
For more similar content and lightning-quick updates delivered directly to your inbox subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Finally, if you want to interact with thousands like you, join your tribe on the Future of Fashion Group.
A decade of fashion; here’s to the next one.
The past decade has been turbulent – and defining – for fashion: child labour, climate crisis, gender inequality, animal cruelty, and reckless plastic pollution, just to name a few.
With the COVID-19 pandemic, the beginning of this decade does not look too good either.
That’s why finding media that reports with rigour and integrity at heart is difficult in critical times.
Finding media that informs all, regardless of where they live or if they can afford to pay, is even harder.
In these times, independent fashion media magazines are increasingly silenced by commercial ownership and social media misinformation.
So far, your unceasing support has allowed us to keep delivering trustworthy, relevant, high-quality content.
Your support allowed us to uphold our editorial independence and ensure honest journalism, free from commercial ownership or political bias.
We are deeply grateful for your generosity and continue to count on your support.