Boycotting won’t end fast fashion, but access to sustainable alternatives. As the fast fashion industry continues to pollute the environment and drive our waste epidemic, consumers are becoming ever conscious of where they spend their money.
Search #BoycottFastFashion, and you’ll find thousands of people pledging to give up their wasteful shopping habits for good.
Fast fashion boycotts, driven by the power of the purse, have become the preferred peaceful method of protest to raise awareness about the industry and inspire large-scale change.
Why Boycotting Fashion?
Most of those boycotting believe their previous purchases made them complicit to an industry that thrives on pollution, animal cruelty, and labour exploitation.
Shoppers are increasingly seeking to purchase and showcase cruelty-free and eco-friend labels, that share their ethical beliefs.
Research carried out by Cone Communications found that 76 per cent of American consumers would boycott a product if the company’s values did not align with their own.
In the words of author and educator Anna Lappé:
“Every time you spend money, you’re casting a vote for the kind of world you want.“
But is ‘voting with your wallet’ such a straightforward solution? A boycott is a mean to pressure a company into change.
How Successful Is Boycotting?
However, measuring change and its success is rather difficult to measure.
Yet, there’s been a precedent; when Ivanka Trump assumed the role of White House adviser, her fashion brand was forced by the masses into closure.
The alleged conflict of interest saw the brand’s sales fall dramatically and even retailers dropped her merchandise.
Nevertheless, experts see this as an exception as in general, boycotting a fashion brand has very little impact on its sales.
“For once, boycotts get minimal national media attention. Then, only one in eighth boycotting campaigns leads to a company making a public concession. A more substantial effect comes from the correlated detrimental impact on the company’s reputation“, said Brayden King, the Management professor at Northwestern University.
As consumer demand for sustainable alternatives is growing, so it is the number of greenwashing claims.
Rarely impacted by fast fashion boycotts, brands will seek to improve sales via collections marked as sustainable.
In most cases, without real restructuring and commitment to sustainable development, their eco-friendly claims are unsubstantiated, diverting attention from genuinely sustainable labels.
But, some experts insist that in the long run, the strategy pays off. As a brand’s profit is the crucial driver, in time, the change demanded by consumers will become the real incentive to invest in sustainable alternatives.
Yes, it may not be the perfect solution but ‘infiltrating from within’ prioritises working with fast fashion brands to create a fairer, cleaner future.
Stella McCartney’s Effect
When Stella McCartney launched her fashion label in 2001, she was laughed at for blending animal welfare with luxury values, and called a hypocrite for giving Gucci Group a 50% stake.
Nevertheless, McCartney was not compromising her ethical values but rather showcasing that there’s possible to be both, luxurious and cruelty-free in fashion.
Ever since Stella’s business model has become a global success, to an extent that other fashion houses, such as Gucci, Versace and Burberry houses, have started to follow the ethical model and go fur-free.
The Real Solution To The Fashion’s Problem
Boycotting fast fashion does not work much. What might work is more ‘Stella McCartney’.
Giving conscious consumers access to more sustainable fashion alternatives, that’s going to create a solid, long-lasting change.
Roberta Lee, a sustainable stylist and founder of the Ethical Brand Directory, sees some merit in this step-by-step approach:
“We need to encourage brands to be fully transparent about what they’re not doing and why. See what the barriers are and where they would like to be if they had the right support and resources“, says Roberta.
“Present calls to boycott fast fashion require consumers’ support. However, when sustainable fashion alternatives are not available, many consumers will find such calls unwarranted and return to old shopping habits,” agrees the CMO of Wardrobe of Tomorrow, Rueen Amiriara.
For example, Nafeezah Padamsey is going to be a bridesmaid later this year. While she is a conscious consumer, it’s very likely she’ll turn to the high street once again. Finding sustainable fashion that caters for her size has been an impossible task so far; “I’m super petite and have always struggled to find outfits that fit me. This time, I’ve checked everywhere, even in charity shops.”
Moreover, boycotting fast fashion does not take into consideration the people behind the brands:
“Fashion-making serves multiple purposes. To all of us, clothes act as functional objects. But, fashion is also a form of art. It is a skilled craft. It is a medium of self-expression and cultural identity,” explains Ruth Macgilp, an ethical fashion blogger and digital marketer.
“But, at the same time, fashion is an industry that employs millions of people and contributes billions to the world’s economy. Therefore, you can’t just ‘boycott’ it away“, adds Ruth.
View this post on Instagram
I’ve had a few new followers recently, so I just wanted to say HIYA! 👋 I’m Ruth, I’m from Birmingham I’m nearly 6 foot tall and I treat charity shopping like its a sport. I live in Edinburgh, and my day job is that I’m a freelance copywriter and social media/digital marketing manager for lots of lovely folk in the fashion and art space. I’ve also been a blogger for many years and create various types of content for social media and my website. I occasionally write articles about the intersection of fashion and sustainability for other publications. While I do bits & bobs with @fash_rev_scotland (see last post) ~and~ finally finish off the last bits of my degree in fashion marketing. I am very busy but that’s how I like it, most of the time. And I will never, ever shut up about ethical fashion. (Or politics, or climate change, or my cat) You might have found me from some pretty cool press I’ve had recently- I wrote an article that got published in @cosmopolitanuk (eep!), I got featured in @lcflondon_’s BAFTA sustainable style guide, and @the.independent just included me in their sustainable fashion influencer roundup. So thank you for joining my adventure, it means the world to lil old me! 📸 Photos by the talented @regenweibchen 👗 Outfit a mix of old + second hand
The economic argument is a powerful argument. Boycotting fast fashion endangers the jobs of workers – of which 80 per cent are women.
Moreover, as 98 per cent of these workers don’t earn a living wage, their survival depends on this source of income.
The toppling of the fast fashion sector may seem them migrate towards unsafer working places and factories.
Thus, it is argued, boycotting fast fashion, would only create a new issue.
However, some experts disagree. According to them, the world won’t stop buying fast fashion overnight, forcing millions of workers into unemployment.
Moreover, the idea of holding on unsafe and underpaid jobs as an alternative to poverty is despicable.
Giving consumers access to sustainable fashion alternatives, free from greenwashing is the only happy medium to date.
It is a solution demanded by those not willing to support an industry that violates their beliefs.
Another solution, to those who cannot afford to purchase sustainable brands, is second-hand shopping.
With between 80 and 100 billion pieces of clothing produced each year, there are plenty of pre-loved garments to be found.
Emily Atkins volunteers as a marketer for her local Red Cross in the hopes of raising the profile of charity shops.
For Emily, shopping second-hand has proven “extremely liberating” because there’s no longer a pressure to wear what everybody else is.
Moreover, her experimental style has gained friends’ attention asking for advice.
According to ThredUP’s annual fashion resale report, both, second-hand fashion market are expected to overtake the global apparel market.
These findings send a powerful message to brands and policymakers that customers want radical changes, towards sustainable fashion.
WTVOX – ‘Voicing the Future of Fashion’
For more similar content and lightning-quick updates delivered directly to your inbox subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Finally, if you want to interact with thousands like you, join your tribe on the Future of Fashion Group.
A decade of fashion; here’s to the next one.
The past decade has been turbulent – and defining – for fashion: child labour, climate crisis, gender inequality, animal cruelty, and reckless plastic pollution, just to name a few.
In these critical times, finding media that reports with rigour and integrity at heart is difficult.
Finding media that informs all, regardless of where they live or if they can afford to pay, is even harder.
Moreover, independent fashion media magazines are increasingly silenced by social media misinformation and commercial ownership.
So far, your unceasing support has allowed us to keep delivering trustworthy, relevant, high-quality content.
Your support allowed us to uphold our editorial independence and ensure honest journalism, free from commercial ownership or political bias.
We are deeply grateful for your generosity and continue to count on your support.