WordPress database error: [Duplicate entry '8388607' for key 'id']
INSERT INTO `wp_et_bloom_stats` (`record_date`, `optin_id`, `record_type`, `page_id`, `list_id`, `ip_address`, `removed_flag`) VALUES ('2020-10-26 01:00:11', 'optin_0', 'imp', 40357, 'mailchimp_b7c874c605', '22.214.171.124', 0)
Listen to this article now
The new H&M and Billie Eilish collection just dropped on January 2, 2020, with H&M hailing it as “edgy and sustainable merch.”
Call the collaboration whatever you wish, don’t call it sustainable.
What the collection loudly puts forth in eco claims, it lacks in transparency and substance.
No, we’re not saying that Billie Eilish is an evil person.
But, calling this collection sustainable without giving customers clear indicators of why, is greenwashing.
It is not just H&M. The Independent, New York Post, Fox Business, and WWD, all called the collection “sustainable.”
The problem: none of these publications investigated the sustainability claim for themselves.
Even worse, they were aware of the issue and didn’t address it.
The New York Post states, “items in the line are designed from materials sourced more sustainably.”
Yet, there’s no explanation of what “more sustainable” means.
Buzzwords such as “sustainable” may sound trustworthy and comfortable, but they’re vague.
If “sustainable” is not further articulated, it doesn’t hold any weight.
“It’s all made from sustainable materials,” states Teen Vogue, a “fact” which should have been checked before they published it.
In fact, only two of 16 items in the collection have sustainably sourced materials.
In comparison, the other 14 items are made just like any fast-fashion piece: with planned obsolescence and by non-transparent means.
A Closer Look at H&M and Billie Eilish Collection
The H&M and Billie Eilish 16-piece collection consist of two “conscious” pieces: a pair of joggers and a t-shirt.
Regarding these two pieces, H&M notes that the cotton content is, in fact, organic, period.
That is the only information you’ll find on the product pages about how they are sustainable, and this is disappointing.
One would think putting a buzzword such as “sustainable” in the spotlight would mean no loose ends to get tied up in.
Even if we give H&M the benefit of the doubt and assume the two Conscious pieces are sustainably made, does having 12.5 per cent sustainable of your entire collection gives you the right to call it a “sustainable collection drop”?
Even a simple majority is at least over 50 per cent.
When we research and evaluate sustainable brands, the threshold for calling a brand sustainable is for at least 50 per cent (a simple majority) of their collections to be sustainably made.
Most of our approved brands even go the extra mile, making 100% of their pieces with eco-friendly fabrics.
We’re transparent about all of this information, too.
This is because we give our consumers credit, and they can hold us accountable for our words.
So, H&M, if you’re going to boast about your sustainability, why not put your money where your mouth is?
WTVOX – ‘Voicing the Future of Fashion’
For more similar content and lightning-quick updates delivered directly to your inbox subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Finally, if you want to interact with thousands like you, join your tribe on the Future of Fashion Group.
A decade of fashion; here’s to the next one.
The past decade has been turbulent – and defining – for fashion: child labour, climate crisis, gender inequality, animal cruelty, and reckless plastic pollution, just to name a few.
With the COVID-19 pandemic, the beginning of this decade does not look too good either.
That’s why finding media that reports with rigour and integrity at heart is difficult in critical times.
Finding media that informs all, regardless of where they live or if they can afford to pay, is even harder.
In these times, independent fashion media magazines are increasingly silenced by commercial ownership and social media misinformation.
So far, your unceasing support has allowed us to keep delivering trustworthy, relevant, high-quality content.
Your support allowed us to uphold our editorial independence and ensure honest journalism, free from commercial ownership or political bias.
We are deeply grateful for your generosity and continue to count on your support.